🔗 Share this article

In a unattributed order, the highest judicial body cleared the way for Texas to use a revised congressional district plan that is projected to include several five additional Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three decision, handed down on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to overturn a federal judge's block that had struck down the boundaries in November.

Justices' Rationale

The district court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing considerable confusion and disturbing the fine equilibrium in elections, the supreme court said in explaining its decision.

The district court had previously found that Texas had probably grouped voters based on their race – a practice known as illegal race-based districting – when it enacted the boundaries. It had mandated the state to employ the boundaries drawn after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Stinging Opposition

Through a forcefully written dissent, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's ruling. She stated that it disrespected the work of the district court, noting that its opinion was actually authored by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan wrote in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, Today's ruling solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced partisan advantage, will control next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas voters, unjustly, will be placed in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has declared consistently, is a violation of the constitution.

Countrywide Redistricting Struggle

The ruling comes amid a nationwide contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to secure a narrow Republican control. Ordinarily, redistricting occurs after a ten-year survey. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that might create several additional Republican-leaning seats. Democrats, for their part, have countered with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Political Responses

The Texas attorney general welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order defended Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes favorable to Republicans. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he stated.

Conversely, Democratic officials lamented the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major Democratic campaign committee.

A senior Democratic leader argued the court had once again shredded its standing by upholding a race-based map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.