🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration is no longer a fundamental right. Instead, it has become a privilege that those in power grant or withhold at their discretion. This represents the implication of proposed measures that the ruling administration is advancing, which would dictate when and where demonstrations can take place, with potential imprisonment for those who defy these limitations.

Erosion of Democratic Rights

Previous administrations had already weakened this fundamental freedom: the previous Tory administration had granted law enforcement sweeping new authorities, which international human rights organizations had censured as "serious and unjustified limitations" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these incremental assaults on liberty have effectively eliminated the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Exploiting Tragedy to Rationalize Crackdown

The latest restrictive measures are being justified by referring to last week's heinous antisemitic assault on a Manchester mosque. We can all agree on universal agreement that the security of British Jews must be protected. However, employing this horrific incident as a pretext to stifle dissent is not only unrelated to that duty but distorts it.

"When you cannot set boundaries at mass killing, you likely can't establish limits at democracy," observed a well-known American author, a statement that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Context of Protest

Reflect on Britain's rich history of public demonstration and activism against racial discrimination and fascism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to after World War II Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s mobilizations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were labeled as radicals in their time, even while they were fighting for the freedoms of marginalized groups.

Present Situation

In the current complex situation, here's what's truly happening: The Israeli government – a foreign state – is perpetrating acts that international bodies have described as genocide. Its military actions have led the global justice body to release legal indictments against Israel's prime minister and his former defense minister.

International popular sentiment has changed significantly against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a large percentage of the public believe Israel has likely committed international law violations. Most people would support a complete ban on weapons exports to the nation, and back the detention of Netanyahu.

Silencing Dissent

Having largely failed the argument, Israel's supporters are now exploiting a despicable anti-Jewish attack to attempt to silence a popular campaign against a ethical disaster. The British government seems included in this attempt. Ministers have not enacted extensive restrictions on Israel and have permitted weapon shipments to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the destruction of Gaza have been characterized as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these demonstrators until now: very limited protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities minimal reason to take action.

Dangerous Conflation

Equating Jewish identity with the actions of the Israeli state is not only cynical but also harmful. The standard interpretation of antisemitism, accepted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately questioned for potentially restricting legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its central illustrations: that "making Jewish people generally accountable for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've reached a point where law enforcement can propose that protests opposing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "accidentally or deliberately" support antisemitism. Similarly, government officials have stated that recognition of Palestine as a nation has made organizations "complicit" in supposed mistreatment experienced by British Jews.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the very day as the synagogue attack, the Israeli military killed numerous of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – adding to the terrible count from two years of daily atrocities that have taken tens of thousands of human lives. British politicians and news organizations have hardly hidden the minimal importance they assign to Palestinian life. This represents one of the boldest expressions of discrimination in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already crossed a dangerous boundary by proscribing Palestine Action, a peaceful, human rights-focused activist collective. Thousands of British protesters have been detained, primarily for carrying signs opposing genocide and endorsing the banned organization. Many of those detained are elderly citizens; among them a former clergyman and the daughter of a World War II genocide survivor.

International Parallels

It's not difficult to see where this path leads. In the United States, government officials helped demonize pro-Palestinian protests: a ex-political leader implied that some were "linked with" other nations, while the sitting leader described such demonstrations as antisemitic. In taking these actions, they helped legitimize the repressive measures on such protests – and on freedom of expression in general.

Looking Ahead

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be granted sweeping powers to suppress opposition. What might a new administration do with this repressive toolkit? Our forebears struggled, endured hardship and died to secure our liberties. We may ultimately rue how casually we permitted them to slip away.